AWSTATS VS PIWIK DOWNLOAD

You just need to learn to appreciate the extra data that you have at your disposal, instead of lamenting that you have more (and different) data than you expected. They track what they are supposed to track and they should be different if they are tracking properly. Those two different analytic programs track 2 very different things. There is no need to choose to be depressed. I personally find the degree of this discrepancy a bit depressing - it means that all the actual numbers are pretty much meaningless. Other website: using Joost Analytics plugin One website: using tomatosoft Analytics plugin If looking to sell advertising space on your site, quote both sets of figures to prospective advertisers - or ask them which they would like.įor my own sites the Ratios for Analyics:Awstats are: Take home message: use either or both to track trends, and most visited pages etc but not one of these sites gives you accurate numbers. How about Alexa? Apparently it's even more unreliable than either Awstats or Analytics, due to limitations on their data gathering methods. Therefore, Awstats data will also be lower than the correct count, but by not as much as Analytics is.

AWSTATS VS PIWIK DOWNLOAD

Awstats only counts those who download the page from the server when they visit, and so will not count anyone who has the page cached from their last visit, or who accesses the page via a caching service. Many of your techy visitors will have blocked AnalyticsĤ. Google Analytics does not collect data from visitors without JavaScript, or with JavaScript disabledģ.

Awstats includes crawler visits in their data, and Google doesn'tĢ. Well I found the answer to my own question - there are lots of reasons for this discrepancy, I'll list a few here:ġ.

Awstats vs piwik